Rock the Cleanup! 60th Anniversary of SSFL Meltdown to be Commemorated July 13

On Saturday, July 13, 2019, community members who live near SSFL will hold an event called “Rock the Cleanup” to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the partial nuclear meltdown at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) and to rally for the full cleanup of SSFL’s nuclear and chemical contamination.

The SSFL cleanup was supposed to be completed by 2017. But it hasn’t even begun, and now the polluters want to walk away from their cleanup agreements and leave most of the contaminatpart of a memorial in honor of workers and community members who’ve been harmed by exposure to SSFL contamination. (Read press release here.)

Rock the Cleanup will be a family friendly event with informative speakers and activities such as rock painting, games, prizes, and $1 Kona Ice. Rocks painted at the event will become part of a memorial in honor of workers and community members who’ve been harmed by exposure to SSFL contamination.

Click here to RSVP and to let us know if you can volunteer. (RSVPs are not required but will help tremendously with planning.)

What happened during the SSFL meltdown? Check out this 2014 SSFL Work Group presentation by John Pace, eyewitness to SSFL meltdown, and the panel discussion after his presentation featuring other former SSFL workers and experts.

New Film Features Families Impacted by Childhood Cancer Near SSFL released a new short film on April 11, 2018 that features families impacted by childhood cancer near SSFL. The online petition organization created the film after a petition launched by West Hills resident Melissa Bumstead caught their attention, and their hearts. Melissa’s daughter Grace is recovering from her second fight against leukemia. During Grace’s first treatment at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Melissa met other parents of children with rare cancers who live near SSFL. She launched the petition to urge DTSC to uphold its commitment to fully cleanup nuclear and chemical contamination at the site that she believes may be responsible for the cancers. The struggle has gained new urgency since the passing of Hazel Hammersley, a Simi valley girl who recently lost a 5 year battle with neuroblastoma. Melissa said, “Losing Hazel has been devastating for us, but her mother wants us to use her passing to push even harder for this cleanup.”

Thousands Comment on DTSC’s PEIR, Demand No Breaking of SSFL Cleanup Agreements

Thousands of community members, as well as elected officials and environmental health organizations submitted comments on the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the SSFL cleanup. The PEIR breaks years of promises that the radioactive and toxic chemical contamination would be completely cleaned up. Instead, it proposes to leave vast amounts of plutonium, strontium-90, cesium-137, perchlorate, PCBs, volatile organic compounds, dioxins, and heavy metals, where they could continue to migrate offsite and place neighboring communities at risk.

Over a thousand local residents submitted individual comments urging DTSC to keep its SSFL cleanup commitments. A petition launched by Melissa Bumstead, a parent whose young daughter had leukemia and has led advocacy efforts on behalf of families impacted by pediatric cancer near SSFL, now has over 100,000 signatures. (You can still sign and share the #1million parents petition!)

Comments from Governments and Elected Officials

Comments from Community, Health, and Environmental Organizations

Key problems with DTSC’s draft PEIR:

  • DTSC’s draft PEIR is essentially a breach of the commitments DTSC had made to require a full cleanup. It includes proposals that would violate the AOC cleanup agreements it signed with DOE and NASA. For Boeing’s part of SSFL, the EIR blocks from even being considered cleanup to the standards DTSC hand long promised. Instead, it says the very best that would be done would be cleanup standards nearly thirty times less protective than DTSC’s own official residential cleanup levels, and far less than the promised cleanup to agricultural/rural residential and background standards.
  • Amazingly, the PEIR has a thousand pages of all the supposed negative impacts of doing a cleanup, but nothing on the negative impacts of the contamination and the health and environmental harm that would occur if the pollution isn’t cleaned up. By omitting cancer risk information and hyping potential negative impacts of the cleanup, the EIR presents a biased and inaccurate assessment of the SSFL cleanup. It is essentially a PR attack on the cleanup commitments DTSC itself had made.
  • DTSC’s PEIR contemplates leaving large amounts of contamination in place, which it refers to as “natural attenuation.” This means just leaving the toxic materials and hoping they lessen over long periods of time. It also violates the AOC cleanup agreements, which prohibit even considering leaving contamination in place.
  • DTSC’s PEIR says that it intends to exempt from cleanup unspecified but apparently huge amounts of contamination for purported biological and cultural reasons, which appear to be far beyond the narrow exemptions allowed under the cleanup agreements. The real threat to the ecology – which is not examined at all in the EIR – is the radioactive and chemical contamination, which needs to be cleaned up to protect ecological features as well as people.
  • Though DTSC in 2010 promised a cleanup for Boeing’s property that would be equivalent to that required for DOE and NASA, the EIR now says Boeing will be allowed to do a less protective than that in the DOE and NASA agreements. Furthermore, it excludes from consideration a cleanup to background or to the rural residential standards previously promised.
  • The PEIR even excludes consideration of DTSC’s own official suburban residential standard, and puts forward instead one that is nearly thirty times less protective. In other words, the very best DTSC is now considering would leave contamination concentrations nearly thirty times higher than DTSC’s own official goals for what is safe for suburban residences, and far higher than even that compared to the cleanup levels DTSC has long promised. Furthermore, the PEIR indicates that Boeing will be allowed to also leave large amounts of contamination in place, for similar “natural attenuation” and unspecified biological and cultural exemptions.
  • The PEIR also fails to disclose what DTSC is actually proposing to not clean up. It is absurd to release a report that gives no real information about what the proposed cleanup amounts will be. DTSC hides the ball—it keeps hidden how much contaminated soil it contemplates not cleaning up, saying that it will disclose that only after the PEIR is finalized. This flies in the face of environmental law, which is to disclose and analyze in the PEIR, not shielding from public view its intentions until after the PEIR is over. And by only giving information about supposed impacts to the environment from cleanup and excluding information on risks to health and the environment from the contamination itself and from not cleaning it all up as promised, the PEIR misrepresents all risks.

To make matters worse, Boeing launched an unscrupulous campaign to try and convince the public and elected officials that it will “protect” SSFL by walking away from almost all of the contamination it is responsible for cleaning up! The community fought back with a new website, Protect Santa Susana from Boeing, which counters Boeing’s outrageous disinformation. You can read the Rocketdyne Cleanup Coalition’s press release about the new website here.